Head-to-head · 3 models compared
DeepSeek vs Gemini
DeepSeek and Google between them account for 3 rated models on the OpenRating Index. DeepSeek's strongest entry is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max) at 53.4, against Gemini's Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) at 56.2. Both are scored on the same axes, with the same tests, below.
Who wins on each axis
Gemini leads all three axes in this comparison.
OpenRating Index
Gemini
56.2
Gemini: Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) · composite 0–100
Output speed
Gemini
392 tok/s
Gemini: Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) · blended tok/s, fastest model
Cost / task
Gemini
$0.096
Gemini: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite · lowest model, per benchmark run
Every rated model, side by side
Sorted by OpenRating Index. Every figure is measured under the same standardised workload.
| Model | Provider | Index | Reasoning | Speed | Cost / task | Input / 1M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) | Gemini | 56.2 | 75.8 | 392 tok/s | $0.40 | $0.3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max) | DeepSeek | 53.4 | 75.2 | 82 tok/s | $0.25 | $0.22 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Gemini | 37.6 | 54.5 | 313 tok/s | $0.096 | $0.05 |
Put DeepSeek and Gemini head to head yourself
Pick any combination of models and compare their full cost breakdown — reasoning, answer generation, cache overhead, and input payload — in the OpenRating comparison tool.
Open the comparison tool →