Head-to-head · 3 models compared
Grok vs Gemini
xAI and Google between them account for 3 rated models on the OpenRating Index. Grok's strongest entry is Grok 4.6 (high) at 60.8, against Gemini's Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) at 56.2. Both are scored on the same axes, with the same tests, below.
Who wins on each axis
Grok takes 1 of 3 axes, Gemini takes 2.
OpenRating Index
Grok
60.8
Grok: Grok 4.6 (high) · composite 0–100
Output speed
Gemini
392 tok/s
Gemini: Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) · blended tok/s, fastest model
Cost / task
Gemini
$0.096
Gemini: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite · lowest model, per benchmark run
Every rated model, side by side
Sorted by OpenRating Index. Every figure is measured under the same standardised workload.
| Model | Provider | Index | Reasoning | Speed | Cost / task | Input / 1M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grok 4.6 (high) | Grok | 60.8 | 83.6 | 69 tok/s | $0.84 | $1.8 |
| Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) | Gemini | 56.2 | 75.8 | 392 tok/s | $0.40 | $0.3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Gemini | 37.6 | 54.5 | 313 tok/s | $0.096 | $0.05 |
Put Grok and Gemini head to head yourself
Pick any combination of models and compare their full cost breakdown — reasoning, answer generation, cache overhead, and input payload — in the OpenRating comparison tool.
Open the comparison tool →Other comparisons
ChatGPT vs Claude
OpenAI · Anthropic
View comparison →
ChatGPT vs Gemini
OpenAI · Google
View comparison →
Claude vs Gemini
Anthropic · Google
View comparison →
Claude vs Grok
Anthropic · xAI
View comparison →
Qwen vs DeepSeek
Alibaba · DeepSeek
View comparison →
DeepSeek vs Gemini
DeepSeek · Google
View comparison →