Head-to-head · 3 models compared
Qwen vs DeepSeek
Alibaba and DeepSeek between them account for 3 rated models on the OpenRating Index. Qwen's strongest entry is Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at 57.9, against DeepSeek's DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max) at 53.4. Both are scored on the same axes, with the same tests, below.
Who wins on each axis
Qwen takes 2 of 3 axes, DeepSeek takes 1.
OpenRating Index
Qwen
57.9
Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B · composite 0–100
Output speed
Qwen
129 tok/s
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) · blended tok/s, fastest model
Cost / task
DeepSeek
$0.25
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max) · lowest model, per benchmark run
Every rated model, side by side
Sorted by OpenRating Index. Every figure is measured under the same standardised workload.
| Model | Provider | Index | Reasoning | Speed | Cost / task | Input / 1M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Qwen | 57.9 | 79.8 | 65 tok/s | $1.09 | $0.4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max) | DeepSeek | 53.4 | 75.2 | 82 tok/s | $0.25 | $0.22 |
| Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) | Qwen | 52.1 | 71.4 | 129 tok/s | $0.26 | $0.12 |
Put Qwen and DeepSeek head to head yourself
Pick any combination of models and compare their full cost breakdown — reasoning, answer generation, cache overhead, and input payload — in the OpenRating comparison tool.
Open the comparison tool →